GREECE, THE LAND WHERE MYTHS REPLACES REALITY

(Myths about Epirus)

What is myth and what does it serve?
Myth is a narrative based usually on a false story which can not be used as a replacement of history, but sometimes myth might be considered a distorted account of a real historical event. The myth does not differ much from a folktale and usually the boundary between them is very thin. Myth can not be considered as history, however in the ancient society of the so called “”Ancient Greeks”” myth was usually regarded as a true account
for a remote past. Surprisingly this ‘tradition’ is descended to the Modern Greeks as well. They never loose the chance to use the myths and the mythology of a remote past and to
pose them as their real ethnic history. continue..

Montenegrin’s – Their Albanian Origin

Slavic invasions certainly decreased the enormous territory of Illyria, which according to APPIAN  (The Foreign Wars Ill. 1.1) extended from Istri (modern Danube) to as far as Chaonia and Thesproti (precisely, Ambracia bay). A large portion of the northern Illyrian population shifted farther south in the rocky mountains of northern Albania, where their culture and ethnic identity survive today, an Illyrian identity which is represented by the modern Albanians. continue..

In the first part ‘Epiri-The Cradle of the Albanian People’, we have argued in a summarized manner some of the important facts cited in the chronics of the old authors but also of those modern, that Epiri population has never been Greek; that it was with an Illyrian content that was part of a Pelasgian complex. The main purpose of this study in continuance is to make known the continuity of ethnicity Illyro-Albanians in Epir from middle-ages all the way to our days.

continue..

PART III

THE DECEITFUL GREEK PROPAGANDA FOR ALEXANDER THE GREAT, MACEDONIA AND EPIRI!

This is response to: http://history-of-macedonia.com/wordpress/2007/04/12/albanian-propaganda-alexander-the-albanian-part-ii/

___________________________________________________

Greeks seem to disappoint everyone that has thought of them as benignant of knowledge, civilizations and science.  Naturally the ancient Greeks hold it these virtues with a lot of dignity, until the Pseudo-Greeks of today who are totally different from the ancients.  In lack of proves, Greeks don’t have the spunk to get engaged directly with citations of the above mentioned authors, but come with prejudgments and low classification of kind: ‘ This is not a historian, this does not have any connection with history‘ and same like this. continue..

Let’s start to expose some fallacies and liars signed by Greek Propaganda

***Greek Claim 1 #: “Barbarian term does not  mean denying of being Greek”

Is that right?  The Greek nationalists speak with so much accuracy as if to have lived in that time to know what meaning had the term ‘barbarian’.  The term ‘barbarian’ precisely means non-Greek, since implies another language that doesn’t get understood by the Greeks.  Taking in consideration the hinge that recognized that ‘the language determined the ethnicity‘ therefore comes to light that Macedonians as well as the Epirotes were non-Greeks. continue..

PART I

THE DECEITFUL GREEK PROPAGANDA FOR ALEXANDER THE GREAT, MACEDONIA AND EPIR!

It is very clear that the Greek propagandists have started to become intimidated from the coming to light of true historical facts that affect directly their mythology made from their political propaganda that they learn since in primary schools to become a “worthy Greek”. That is why Greeks look so frighten, although their illusions are being broken one by one. They want to live inside their illusion world. For this we can not blame them: let them live in their illusion world, but they have to know where the illusion ends and the reality starts. continue..

Epirus was an ancient region geographically stretching from the Acroceraune Mountains  all the way to Bay of Ambracia. Its boundaries shifted  frequently in historical period. The question whether ancient Epirotes were Greeks or not has raged fierce debates among modern scholars.   Some holds that Epirotes were of Greek stock, in other words they had a Greek identity. Yet a range of various scholars dispute the bewildering assumption that associate Epirotes with the Greeks.   One is tempted to ask  what their origin might have been?

continue..